From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jul 21 17:40:51 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.antisocial.net (ns1.antisocial.net [208.10.211.34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4416515534
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from modred@ns1.antisocial.net)
Received: from localhost (modred@localhost)
	by ns1.antisocial.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA16055;
	Wed, 21 Jul 1999 19:36:30 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 19:36:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Modred <modred@ns1.antisocial.net>
To: Vincent Poy <vince@venus.GAIANET.NET>
Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>,
	Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>,
	Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com>, sthaug@nethelp.no,
	leifn@neland.dk, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: poor ethernet performance?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211013530.331-100000@venus.GAIANET.NET>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211906180.15958-100000@ns1.antisocial.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:

> 	Speaking about Layer 2 and layer 3.  Does the Cisco Catalyst
> 2924XL and the HP ProCurve 2424M and 4000M switches fall under Layer 3 or
> just layer 2?

Cisco, yes...  HP, no clue (perhaps you could check their website).

2900XL Architecture Notes:

	http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/switch/cat/2900xl \
	/tech/malbu_wp.htmhttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/ \
	switch/cat/2900xl/tech/malbu_wp.htm

2900XL Management Guide:

	http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/ \
	29_35sa6/index.htm

IOW, RTFM.

Later,
--mike




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message