From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jan 8 8:26:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE4A37B417 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id 876E59B19; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:26:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:26:43 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: WANT_KDE_NDEBUG (Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/kdemultimedia2...) Message-ID: <20020108112643.W73815@squall.waterspout.com> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Sheldon Hearn , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20020107232825.U73815@squall.waterspout.com> <48306.1010484226@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48306.1010484226@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:03:46PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > That's an interesting opinion, but it's not an established policy > in the ports tree, and you should be very careful about making it > so without first consulting the community, your position as portmgr > notwithstanding. It's not established policy. No one, portmgr or otherwise, has said what the policy regarding optimizations for debugging or speed should be. Therefore it's the porter's choice. However, I agree with Dan Langille that people should be notified of the options when the build something. I'll figure something out along those lines. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message