From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 24 12:48:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA14090 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 24 May 1997 12:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from florence.pavilion.net (mailrelay1.pavilion.net [194.242.128.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA14084 for ; Sat, 24 May 1997 12:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from joe@localhost) by florence.pavilion.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA13204; Sat, 24 May 1997 20:47:57 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <19970524204757.02891@pavilion.net> Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 20:47:57 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Named -- Specifying addresses to bind to. References: <19970523152900.36766@pavilion.net> <199705240116.KAA03569@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69 In-Reply-To: <199705240116.KAA03569@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>; from Michael Smith on Sat, May 24, 1997 at 10:46:39AM +0930 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, May 24, 1997 at 10:46:39AM +0930, Michael Smith wrote: > Josef Karthauser stands accused of saying: > > BTW. Why do I still need libc.so.2.2 on my fbsd2.2.2 machine when > > it has compiled libc.so.3.0? I've done reboot and another make world > > to try and get it to link against the newer library, but It doesn't > > want to play :(. I'd like a nice tidy system ;) > > Probably because you have ports linked against it. LibraryReport > (/usr/src/tools/lreport/LibraryReport) will scan your system and give > you a summary of shared library usage and dependancies which may shed > some light on your situation. Yep, found it. 'Twas my 'bash' shell ;) Joe -- Josef Karthauser Technical Manager Email: joe@pavilion.net Pavilion Internet plc. [Tel: +44 1273 607072 Fax: +44 1273 607073]