From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 21 3:33: 2 2000 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 21 03:33:01 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E89D37B402 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 03:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA12347; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:32:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Sender: des@ofug.org X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Supporting VirtualPC... References: <200012210548.XAA23830@guild.plethora.net> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Dec 2000 12:32:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net's message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 23:48:10 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) writes: > I am wondering what would be considered a "good" way to encode the knowledge > that machines with "ConnectixCPU" in the mode string need specific special > treatment in two widely disparate places. Assuming the ident code correctly sets cpu_vendor to "ConnectixCPU" (rather than e.g. "GenuineIntel" or "AuthenticAMD") you can just check against that. It's declared in . DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message