Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 02:00:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A quality operating system Message-ID: <1315040419366-4765099.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20110820162245.166e8a05@scorpio> References: <CAC1X_0bP8SeyqMaR68AQPMzT%2Br-isv4h0bJPdtaF3377bQ%2BajQ@mail.gmail.com> <86wre8inmi.fsf@gmail.com> <CA754F69.68E1F%dave-sa@pooserville.com> <CAHu1Y70vTvW%2BHxNOjf=n5qeq25hCOifYyoX2ivSfNbpTXG7_jg@mail.gmail.com> <20110820162245.166e8a05@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why Sorry, it's looks roughly applicable here. I'm guilty too, but I don't want/use binary upgrades. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/A-quality-operating-system-tp4717703p4765099.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1315040419366-4765099.post>