From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 18:08:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD4537B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out005.verizon.net (out005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744FD43F75 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([141.149.47.46]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030611010817.RIOS20032.out005.verizon.net@mac.com> for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:08:17 -0500 Message-ID: <3EE680FD.1060800@mac.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:08:13 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030610152538.00b48be0@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> <3EE595D2.B223CA19@mindspring.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20030610152538.00b48be0@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> <5.2.0.9.2.20030610153334.00bc2c98@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030610153334.00bc2c98@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [141.149.47.46] at Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:08:17 -0500 Subject: Re: Slow disk write speeds over network X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 01:08:19 -0000 Pedram Nimreezi wrote: > I'm sorry I don't mean to be vague but I just get a bit tired of reading > 40 posts on NFS itself... I haven't seen a lot of list traffic about NFS. > I have never once used NFS and don't see the need for it, but if one > feels there is a need. Identify the causality... I need to integrate > a shared medium with 100+ computers because ... 1. You want to share filesystems like user home directories, project work areas, etc among all of those client machines without having to copy all of the files (can resyncronize them, make room on each local drive, etc)...? -Chuck