Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:17 +0000
From:      Colin O'Keeffe <cokeeffe@gmail.com>
To:        Dustin Wenz <dustinwenz@ebureau.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Default ephemeral port range
Message-ID:  <95686CBD-5A11-48BD-A556-5133F537C82E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <87A2D317-77BA-4641-979D-0AE43247D99E@ebureau.com>
References:  <87A2D317-77BA-4641-979D-0AE43247D99E@ebureau.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
8.1 through 9.1RC will use net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst (49152) to =
.hilast (65535) for ephemeral ports as far as I'm aware. =
net.inet.ip.portrange.first to .last are just a reference to available =
port numbers as per RFC6056

Correct me if I'm wrong but netinet/in_pcb.c:490 indicates this is the =
case.

-Colin

On 12 Nov 2012, at 17:57, Dustin Wenz wrote:

> I'm trying to determine why the default ephemeral port range appears =
to be 10000 through 65535 in at least 8.1 through 9.1RC. Documentation =
regarding the lower bound on the range seems inconsistent. The FreeBSD =
website (http://wiki.freebsd.org/SystemTuning) suggests that =
net.inet.ip.portrange.first defaults to 49152, which I don't believe is =
accurate.
>=20
> The IANA recommends the range be 49152 through 65535 =
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6056). Is there any particular reason why =
net.inet.ip.portrange.first defaults to 10000?
>=20
> 	- .Dustin
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?95686CBD-5A11-48BD-A556-5133F537C82E>