From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 00:12:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACCE1065670 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phil.brennan@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6035B8FC13 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phil.brennan@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so1752244rne.12 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:11:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=bhWUq5niqFpnz1VFz1ocRsqmfER6cSxdma0+u/cujhk=; b=u99cpBG/bOQ6Yr1h9MTLRgc8hWjrYqSqiXoU63YeJ3cxORLxkVpeHbdq/Ef9Qy271O LcFJ4eb1NSJXRVR4KaFx1XagszUPvr5XpaJlmeB9z9zP7h/je46xZ0IwH2N/k80Fll3M W7T7Q5QSRcRZ6chkHrYBJAozg6INAzkG1x5OA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MW2zZqL5c6r8l7n6whxzT4+OGpf+47pnAbSgVy5OL9kH/tTslqJM09DB7/t6sJO+7z giJG+fBY7RHl2ubBfK+C668QbZVv4a3vRl5sggkF1M8IO50HpFh2JC7r3qdv5QvXv1RH rgm9WENG9pckQVMmFyxtgyC6hZ0mffMYE/rfY= Received: by 10.143.17.13 with SMTP id u13mr1881531wfi.180.1227570202061; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:43:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.50.17 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:43:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:43:22 +0000 From: "Phil Brennan" To: "Steven Hartland" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 BETA 2 vs Opensolaris vs Ubuntu performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:12:00 -0000 Sorry thats one of the worst pieces of "journalism" I've ever encountered. Benchmarks useless ( single threaded ), no useful analysis, not even any speculation ( informed or otherwise ). On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=os_threeway_2008&num=1 > > Was interesting until I saw this:- > > "However, it's important to reiterate that all three operating systems were > left in their stock configurations and that no additional tweaking had > occurred." > > I kernel debugging stuff still enabled in FreeBSD 7.1 BETA 2, if so these > results are useless > and someone should contact the article writers to correct this. > > Regards > Steve > > ================================================ > This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the > person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the > recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise > disseminating it or any information contained in it. > In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please > telephone +44 845 868 1337 > or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >