From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 18:17:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D0D16A41F for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:17:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0FC43D58 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:17:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so1885wra for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:17:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kgwIRfI+e6WApJmLOrDtt22iIaCVtBEpk2i41ZZBzUenm+vI1Jn5H+SKncn7k7hUu5wcNiG4yyJG8xQwB5kvdWnpnF5Hb351PZZnAGdgFddes6HqsYx8L/5gaCkVSemtLz7677PngCgg33qRX3SpnxvcFxh4P76X0yL78ymPNHU= Received: by 10.54.49.72 with SMTP id w72mr4472534wrw; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:17:21 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4301f9b7.1c4.0@utvinternet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4301f9b7.1c4.0@utvinternet.com> Subject: Re: multicore Intel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:17:24 -0000 On 8/16/05, Charles Smyth wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Will FreeBSD still be functional with the new crop of Intel dual and mult= icore > processors, when they become more available and replace single core proce= ssors. >=20 >=20 I don't see why not as this should all be transparent to the operating system above it... This is why HyperThreading works, or doesn't depending on your perspective, and shows up as an SMP box. Read this article: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/01/20/smpng.html