From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 31 01:29:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA17360
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 01:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA17355
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 01:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost)
          by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.4/8.8.4) with UUCP
	  id JAA22417 for freebsd.org!hackers; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 09:12:24 +0100 (BST)
From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 09:11:11 +0100
Message-Id: <23781.199707310811@seagoon.gid.co.uk>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SCSI 1542 error
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In article <199707291542.JAA12346@rocky.mt.sri.com>,
Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.COM> wrote:
>You're not the first.  It appears to me from watching the mailing list
>that the 1542 boards are not supported in 2.2.  *Many* people have
>reported problems with them, which unfortunately means that I can no
>longer do 2.2 development at home. :(

I've got two machines running 2.2.x on 1542CF with no problems; my -current
machine runs on one too.

A thought: have those reporting trouble got the transfer rate wound up
on the controller? Mine are running on the defaults.