From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jan 20 07:41:13 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA12543
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:41:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA12486
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:40:55 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1)
	id 102zjA-000CNY-00; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:39:32 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <axl@iafrica.com>
To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
cc: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:21:23 PST."
             <199901201521.HAA05211@vashon.polstra.com> 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:39:32 +0200
Message-ID: <47587.916846772@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:21:23 PST, John Polstra wrote:

> Is "make clean" really necessary?  A "make depend" ought to be
> sufficient, I would think.

I think that's an attempt to protect people who've upgraded from STABLE
and haven't gotten used to ``config -r''?

Ciao,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message