From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 4 11:20:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29695 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:20:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp1.erols.com (smtp1.erols.com [207.172.3.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA29625 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:19:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@vt.edu) Received: from ryturner (207-172-191-118.s55.as1.mkt.erols.com [207.172.191.118]) by smtp1.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA06016 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:19:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980804141939.0097eaf0@pop.erols.com> X-Sender: thehades@pop.erols.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 14:19:39 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Ryan Turner Subject: release vs snap Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a 11.5 gig drive and only 3.0 snap is able to see all of it. I know you should not use snap if you just want it for a bug fix, but this is the only way not to loose 3 gigs of space. If I use 3.0 snap, will I have lots of other problems? Ryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message