From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 12:51:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEC8106566C for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.thyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA058FC0A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so513087wgb.31 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:51:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gemo7LPma19NFF2uIlEfWomy/+ZhHZHDGmCe2ZHtrNE=; b=AhInlpSWb/fbR1zEN+xqZPTjmp3aXm4u+3Fm++EQeB/3z4ElKC9VpMLBY3U+4FqLwT 6q+rqbpc/+tLRsotMo3PH2WIuPBAI32QoCJRKjcsOiF/rAs82hLiNEgTHwQAB7sI79EQ pKOr4cwmlVPTZHSh95KOOOFTFxuQjH27acwDDcjA1K7K29ezD1wbwu8HuzCTg2A1yurW yLonDcLN/imuG8XbQ0+IAbcpBv8pfMB4P4z5QUXmuUa5KdHK6untqRjuLRJGXi32iIZF BmMgQdyIObtglcyk8/hUjO/Ca3dxy/hWZuS/MPBjEkKPjxSIXC+BvnxS3GcEZ5gpak/S Pd9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.79.135 with SMTP id j7mr6112866wix.19.1333111865245; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.219 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.219 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:51:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F74BCE8.2030802@vangyzen.net> References: <4F746F1E.6090702@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4F74BCE8.2030802@vangyzen.net> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:21:05 +1030 Message-ID: From: Matt Thyer To: Eric van Gyzen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD current Subject: Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:51:06 -0000 On Mar 30, 2012 6:22 AM, "Eric van Gyzen" wrote: > However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storage, please do not. Some people expect /tmp to be persistent. This is why /etc/defaults/rc.conf has clear_tmp_enable="NO". Changing this would break the POLA. > This is a mistake. The default should be clear_tmp_enable="YES" if only to uncover those broken configurations that expect /tmp to be persistent. I was going to say "At least on -CURRENT" but in reality it should be the default on -RELEASE too when it's clearly a bug to expect /tmp to be persistent.