Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:38:07 +0200 From: Nico Meijer <nico.meijer@zonnet.nl> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [another "me too"] Re: portindex/portindexdb Message-ID: <413DF1FF.9020104@zonnet.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040907062449.GA41144@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <7A727F81-FCE2-11D8-8BE7-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> <008901c4934e$a7c5b260$0200000a@SAGEAME> <413B5F14.6090405@zonnet.nl> <200409051452.06236.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <413C0FAE.1000502@zonnet.nl> <20040907003500.GA11100@panix.com> <413D39D7.6050009@zonnet.nl> <20040907062449.GA41144@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Matthew, > Another workaround is simply to set: > > PORTS_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash > > in your environment, and then use portsdb and portupgrade as usual. May I bluntly - yet politely - ask why you would prefer this workaround as opposed to replacing `portsdb -Uu` with `portindex && portindexdb`, other than to avoid having to install extra software? I can imagine a few, but I value your opinion. Thanks a bunch... Nico
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?413DF1FF.9020104>