From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 18 22:41:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C26E14F15; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 22:41:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id OAA11981; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:39:39 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37BB88F3.7184305@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 13:32:51 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terry Lambert Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , michaelh@cet.co.jp, wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov, Matthew.Alton@anheuser-busch.com, Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite References: <199908181848.LAA14960@usr02.primenet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry Lambert wrote: > > Make sure that the system you are talking to over the proxy is > not assumed to be a FreeBSD system (e.g. don't assume that the > vfs_default stuff exists on the other end of the proxy, or that > it would be functional). Now, Terry, that is ridiculous. One has to assume that both ends play by the same rules. That is not only a reasonably expectation, it's minimum requirement for any protocol to work. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org - Can I speak to your superior? - There's some religious debate on that question. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message