From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 07:35:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE30316A400 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from cprobd02.vailsys.com (cprobd02.vailsys.com [63.210.102.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDB213C4A7 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dfsfbd06.vail (dfsfbd06.vail [192.168.129.190]) by cprobd02.vailsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41187CE506; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:35:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dfwdamian.vail [192.168.129.233]) by dfsfbd06.vail (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6AD323E90; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:35:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dwiest@localhost.vail [127.0.0.1]) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0N7Z6h9010761; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:35:06 -0600 (CST) Received: (from dwiest@localhost) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l0N7Z6p9025362; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:35:06 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: dfwdamian.vail: dwiest set sender to dwiest@vailsys.com using -f Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:35:06 -0600 From: Damian Wiest To: Steve Franks Message-ID: <20070123073506.GB6053@dfwdamian.vail> References: <539c60b90701161033v5e316ef4m19332bd6e86ab67b@mail.gmail.com> <20070123011659.GD22569@dfwdamian.vail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070123011659.GD22569@dfwdamian.vail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions Subject: Re: hardware mirrors recognized as individual disks in fbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:35:07 -0000 On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:16:59PM -0600, Damian Wiest wrote: [snip] > Real hardware RAID chips/cards tend to be expensive, > proprietary, don't require an OS driver and include a battery backup > system for data in the RAID cache should the system lose power. I don't know what I was thinking, of course the hardware RAID systems require drivers. -Damian