Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Dec 2012 18:13:04 -0800
From:      Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com>
To:        Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>
Cc:        n j <nino80@gmail.com>, Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd>, tundra@tundraware.com, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Somewhat OT: Is Full Command Logging Possible?
Message-ID:  <8E7AE88A-5241-42CC-807F-FA42162EE83E@fisglobal.com>
In-Reply-To: <FF701E50933D18DB396E2B33@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local>
References:  <50BFD674.8000305@tundraware.com> <8BFA2629-45CA-491B-9BA8-E8AC78A4D66E@my.gd> <50BFDCFD.4010108@tundraware.com> <CALf6cgb0%2BGXrtTymOPOmjV_C2sk7EaGK=qJOF2z4mB3pQkzV_g@mail.gmail.com> <50C0EFA4.3010902@tundraware.com> <6A61448BD1FE69ED206EB42E@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> <04283347-1955-4C49-9ADD-6D2FBB1B0EDC@my.gd> <FF701E50933D18DB396E2B33@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:

> --On December 7, 2012 10:23:56 AM +0100 Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> wrot=
e:
>>=20
>>> --On December 6, 2012 1:19:00 PM -0600 Tim Daneliuk
>>> <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> I understand this.  Even the organization in question understands
>>>> this.  They are not trying to *prevent* any kind of access.  All
>>>> they're trying to do *log* it.  Why?  To meet some obscure
>>>> compliance requirement they have to adhere to in order to
>>>> remain in business.
>>>>=20
>>>> <rant>
>>>> I know all of this is silly but that's our future when you
>>>> let Our Fine Government regulate pretty much anything.
>>>> </rant>
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> I sent this last night, but for some reason it never showed up.
>>>=20
>>> /usr/ports/security/sudoscript
>>>=20
>>> I believe this will meet your requirements.
>>=20
>>=20
>> I'm sorry to say it won't.
>> Nothing will prevent a user from removing sudoscript's FIFO once he gets
>> root privileges.
>>=20
>=20
> Well, sure, but, if someone logs in and sudos to root, that will be logge=
d by sudoscript.  If the logging then ceases, that would be cause for disci=
plinary action up to and including dismissal.
>=20

What about the case of:

sudo vim

or

sudo vim file

Surely that wouldn't raise an eyebrow, but=85

Then execute within vim:

:sh

or

^_^
--=20
Devin

=85 and another gem =85

sr env HOME=3D$HOME vim

then

:E

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia=
l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an=
d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma=
nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware=
 that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie=
w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8E7AE88A-5241-42CC-807F-FA42162EE83E>