Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 18:13:04 -0800 From: Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com> To: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> Cc: n j <nino80@gmail.com>, Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd>, tundra@tundraware.com, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Somewhat OT: Is Full Command Logging Possible? Message-ID: <8E7AE88A-5241-42CC-807F-FA42162EE83E@fisglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <FF701E50933D18DB396E2B33@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> References: <50BFD674.8000305@tundraware.com> <8BFA2629-45CA-491B-9BA8-E8AC78A4D66E@my.gd> <50BFDCFD.4010108@tundraware.com> <CALf6cgb0%2BGXrtTymOPOmjV_C2sk7EaGK=qJOF2z4mB3pQkzV_g@mail.gmail.com> <50C0EFA4.3010902@tundraware.com> <6A61448BD1FE69ED206EB42E@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> <04283347-1955-4C49-9ADD-6D2FBB1B0EDC@my.gd> <FF701E50933D18DB396E2B33@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On December 7, 2012 10:23:56 AM +0100 Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd> wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> wrot= e: >>=20 >>> --On December 6, 2012 1:19:00 PM -0600 Tim Daneliuk >>> <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> I understand this. Even the organization in question understands >>>> this. They are not trying to *prevent* any kind of access. All >>>> they're trying to do *log* it. Why? To meet some obscure >>>> compliance requirement they have to adhere to in order to >>>> remain in business. >>>>=20 >>>> <rant> >>>> I know all of this is silly but that's our future when you >>>> let Our Fine Government regulate pretty much anything. >>>> </rant> >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I sent this last night, but for some reason it never showed up. >>>=20 >>> /usr/ports/security/sudoscript >>>=20 >>> I believe this will meet your requirements. >>=20 >>=20 >> I'm sorry to say it won't. >> Nothing will prevent a user from removing sudoscript's FIFO once he gets >> root privileges. >>=20 >=20 > Well, sure, but, if someone logs in and sudos to root, that will be logge= d by sudoscript. If the logging then ceases, that would be cause for disci= plinary action up to and including dismissal. >=20 What about the case of: sudo vim or sudo vim file Surely that wouldn't raise an eyebrow, but=85 Then execute within vim: :sh or ^_^ --=20 Devin =85 and another gem =85 sr env HOME=3D$HOME vim then :E _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8E7AE88A-5241-42CC-807F-FA42162EE83E>