Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:35:31 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 239832] security/secpanel hard-coding of "gnome-terminal" fails under mate-only installation
Message-ID:  <bug-239832-6497-QFKmOm7vwh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-239832-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-239832-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239832

--- Comment #4 from Jim D. <radicleparticles@gmail.com> ---
It is not a problem of gnome-terminal failing to be installed.

The issue is that secpanel's default configuration specifically uses
"gnome-terminal" as its runtime option. I do not have the Gnome desktop
installed - I have the Mate desktop installed. Hence - "gnome-terminal" is =
not
installed. This makes secpanel unusable as it attempts to invoke
"gnome-terminal" which doesn't exist.

By changing the secpanel default terminal definition to "mate-terminal", I =
can
now get the full secpanel functionality without the Gnome desktop.

The suggestions offered were to modify the Makefile to provide a port insta=
ller
the option of which terminal application to define for secpanel to use.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239832-6497-QFKmOm7vwh>