From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 20:04:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD6D106568D for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C084C8FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30534 invoked by uid 399); 19 Dec 2009 20:04:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 19 Dec 2009 20:04:16 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B2D31C3.10108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:04:19 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dominic Fandrey References: <4B2A52DB.5020602@bsdforen.de> <20091218065728.GC29158@lonesome.com> <4B2B681A.1090908@bsdforen.de> <4B2C888A.6000006@FreeBSD.org> <4B2CEA57.5050904@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <4B2CEA57.5050904@bsdforen.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ioquake3 support more platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:17 -0000 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > But this is not the case we're talking about (I explained the process > in sufficient detail, I think). I take an up to date snapshot, apply my > patch set, make a couple of test builds and runs, update the patch set > until everything works as expected. Than I wrap the whole thing (SVN > snapshot and my patches) up in a tar.gz and upload it to an ftp server. Well then I misunderstood what was proposed, and I apologize for that. What you described is supported, and some ports are already doing it. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/