From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Nov 22 03:03:43 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA12830
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 03:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from diablo.ppp.de (diablo.ppp.de [193.141.101.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA12825
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 03:03:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.de>
Received: from freebie.lemis.de by diablo.ppp.de with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0vQtNW-000QrTC; Fri, 22 Nov 96 12:02 MET
Received: (grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.de (8.8.3/8.6.12) 
       id LAA00577; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:59:48 +0100 (MET)
Organisation: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, 36325 Feldatal, Germany
Phone: +49-6637-919123
Fax:   +49-6637-919122
Message-Id: <199611221059.LAA00577@freebie.lemis.de>
Subject: Re: Looking for someone to do secondary DNS
In-Reply-To: <9611191624.AA02758@squid.gage.com> from Ben Black at "Nov 19, 96 10:24:54 am"
To: black@gage.com (Ben Black)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:59:48 +0100 (MET)
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD Questions)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Ben Black writes:
>>  My ISP won't do it for me, security reasons.
>
> this is absolutely ridiculous.  secondary DNS is such a simple service and
> certainly not a security risk.  i would get a new ISP.

I second that.  It's one of the basic ISP services.  If they're that
worried about security, maybe they should get off the net.

Greg