From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 2 14:49:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1985A16A417 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@dobrohot.org) Received: from smtp-8.masterhost.ru (smtp-8.masterhost.ru [83.222.24.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67E8413C45E for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@dobrohot.org) Received: (qmail 76113 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2007 14:49:14 -0000 Received: from ns.km10433.keymachine.de (HELO inspirra.localdomain) (izdat%dobrohot.org@62.141.50.149) by smtp1.masterhost.ru with SMTP; 2 Aug 2007 14:49:14 -0000 Received: from inspirra.localdomain (inspirra.localdomain [192.168.2.1]) by inspirra.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l72EVwDT015772 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:31:58 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from andrew@dobrohot.org) Message-ID: <46B1EADD.4040000@dobrohot.org> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:31:57 +0400 From: Andrew Muhametshin Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JDQndCeICLQlNC+0LHRgNC+0YXQvtGCIg==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070721) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org References: <46AF933D.10602@dobrohot.org> <20070731.140413.104054619.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20070731.140413.104054619.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: uscanner + HPS' usb stack + nvidia-driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:49:32 -0000 Warner Losh пишет: >> I've tested it in -CURRENT with x11/nvidia-driver and official USB stack >> - problem can't be reproduced, but scanning speed is much lower than >> with HPS' USB stack. >> >> Is there any hope that it will be solved in the near future? >> > > Define: Much slower. With my scanner, I can't measure a difference in > speed using xsane between the two, although I have done only limited > testing with hps' stack. > Sorry for some confusion on my part, I thought that HPS' USB stack is already in -CURRENT. But anyway, here are results (and question still stands - is there any way to speed up scanning process; difference becomes hours for hundreds of images): $ uname -a #(+ HPS' USB stack revision 538) FreeBSD host01 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Wed Aug 1 05:45:10 MSD 2007 root@host01:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST01 i386 $ uname -a FreeBSD host01.localdomain 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Jul 26 07:45:03 MSD 2007 root@host01.localdomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ uname -r 6.2-STABLE $ time scanimage -p --mode color --resolution 600 --quick-format max > /PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/6_2-600-max01.pnm Progress: 100.0% real 0m40.984s user 0m3.414s sys 0m0.821s $ uname -r 7.0-CURRENT $ time scanimage -p --resolution 600 --quick-format max --mode color > /PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/7_0-600-max01.pnm Progress: 100.0% real 0m56.550s user 0m3.729s sys 0m0.597s $ uname -r 6.2-STABLE $time scanimage -p --mode color --depth 16 --resolution 600 --quick-format max > /PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/6_2-600-16-max01.pnm Progress: 100.0% real 1m4.007s user 0m7.485s sys 0m1.731s $ uname -r 7.0-CURRENT $ time scanimage -p --mode color --depth 16 --quick-format max --resolution 600 > /PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/7_0-600-16-max01.pnm Progress: 100.0% real 1m40.989s user 0m7.606s sys 0m1.238