From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Sep  3  7: 5:49 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148B414BEC
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Sep 1999 07:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost (641 bytes) by rip.psg.com
	via sendmail with P:stdio/R:inet_resolve/T:smtp
	(sender: <randy>) (ident <randy> using unix)
	id <m11Mtvc-0008G3C@rip.psg.com>
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 07:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #1 built 1999-Apr-1)
Message-Id: <m11Mtvc-0008G3C@rip.psg.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 07:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Ugen Antsilevitch <ugen@xonix.com>
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: NAT speed?
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Did anyone make any kind of benchmarking on the NAT?
> I am interested in number of connections per hour / total simultaneous
> connections and any other perfomance related experience you may have had
> with it?

if you intend to work on this, for measurement criteria, you may want to
look at draft-ietf-bmwg-secperf-08.txt.

randy


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message