Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:25:44 +0100 (CET) From: Leif Neland <leifn@neland.dk> To: Troy Settle <troy@psknet.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: tinydns Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102272318280.17254-100000@arnold.neland.dk> In-Reply-To: <BFEGKDHLHDNOJEIHJDBAIECHCBAA.troy@psknet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Troy Settle wrote: > > I don't know, perhaps it's the fact that it's the only daemon that's dumping > core (sig 11) on a fairly unloaded server. When I posted earlier today, > it's done it twice in a week, it dumped again this afternoon. I'm running > 8.2.3, and that's teh current "stable" version listed on ISC's web site. > > I appreciate that BIND is used by hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of > networks around the world, but it's been less than reliable here. I've been > using various versions of BIND for some 6 years now, and I've never seen it > behave like this. In addition to that, if one is to believe the security > warnings, everything before 8.2.3 has holes in it, and just because one's > not been found, doesn't mean that 8.2.3 doesn't have one either. > I still think there must be something fishy, probably a non-discovered hole... I've had more bind's dying the last two weeks than the last two years. And I'm not using signed zones like the latest security advisory mentions. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0102272318280.17254-100000>