From owner-cvs-all Mon Feb 17 17:21: 5 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D87B37B401; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:21:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA3643F85; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:21:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <2003021801210000100m36mfe>; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:21:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA17158; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:20:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:20:57 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Jake Burkholder Cc: Scott Long , Julian Elischer , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha exception.s genassym.c In-Reply-To: <20030217152317.D81102@locore.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Jake Burkholder wrote: > Apparently, On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:35:49AM -0800, > Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; > > > src/sys/i386/i386 exception.s genassym.c sys_machdep.c src/sys/i386/isa > > > > npx.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 exception.s genassym.c src/sys/kern > > kern_clock.c > > kern_intr.c kern_sig.c kern_switch.c ... > > In-Reply-To: <3E50B51F.1050803@btc.adaptec.com> > > Message-ID: > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > > > > > It was compiled and run on alpha it was compiled and run on x86 UP and > > compiled on X86 SMP It was seen to run on most of these the last time it > > was commited as well before the drive-by backout. Jake supplied the > > sparc assembler diff. > > Was this tested on a sparc? I didn't have time to test it and didn't > expect you to commit it immediately. Please do not do this again. I presumed you'd tested it.. in fact I was led to believe you had.. I just compiled it. I have no sparc I can reboot. I'm more worried about the ia64 patch. As a sidebar, in my opinion sparc is irrelevant except as a porting exercize to keep the code clean. I think it is damaging to the project to have it a tier 1 architecture. In case no-one has noticed the sparc comes with a unix OS already, so the market is miniscule. techncally nice, but basically irrelevant to the success of the project except as a roadblock to progress. Anyhow that's just my opinion. Others are free to disagree (and obviously do). (Nothing personal, just my opinion on where we should be placing sparc stuff in he overall priority list.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message