From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 30 22:30:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEFC726 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5957D23E7 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7UMU2Bk039219 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:30:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r7UMU2Hj039218; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:30:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:30:02 GMT Message-Id: <201308302230.r7UMU2Hj039218@freefall.freebsd.org> To: apache@FreeBSD.org From: Jeff Lawson Subject: Re: ports/181421: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- update to 2.1.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jeff Lawson List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:30:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/181421; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jeff Lawson To: "bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" , "gahr@FreeBSD.org" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/181421: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- update to 2.1.2 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:18:26 +0000 The upgrade to Rivet 2.1.2 was actually already completed by PR 180444 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D180444 Although the additional configuration options provided by this patch is functionality and flexibility beyond the scope of the above PR, I don't think there is sufficient demand for those non-default modes to necessitate complicating the port installation with them. Also of note, your patch enforces a USE_TCL=3D86 which is unnecessarily strict since it prevents users of Tcl 8.5, which is still a supported version. USE_TCL=3D85+ is sufficient, and is what was put in place by abov= e PR.