From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 22 09:50:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE6EAB0796; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216F71ED9; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc91230-cmbg18-2-0-cust661.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.1.230.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u1M9o7jf096327 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:50:09 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: theravensnest.org: Host cpc91230-cmbg18-2-0-cust661.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.1.230.150] claimed to be [192.168.0.7] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: help make port for opencoarrays From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <20160222100149.05fbca90@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:50:01 +0000 Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , thierry@FreeBSD.org, fortran@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7219F774-9964-40EB-A983-33CF1013987C@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160221164250.GC2122@graf.pompo.net> <201602212151.u1LLpRBB085896@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <20160222100149.05fbca90@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> To: Tijl Coosemans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:50:19 -0000 On 22 Feb 2016, at 09:01, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >=20 > I think Fortran is fine. It's C++ that's in a bad shape. I think the > lang/gcc* ports need to be modified so libstdc++ sits on top of = libcxxrt > instead of libsupc++. Maybe David can say more about that (CCed). Ideally, they should be modified to just use libc++. I thought that = bapt had done this, but I might have misremembered. Mixing libstdc++ = and libc++ is fine if both sit on top of libcxxrt and no standard = library types cross library boundaries, but is problematic otherwise = (the good news is that you=E2=80=99ll get linker failures if they do try = to cross library boundaries, unless they=E2=80=99re thrown as = exceptions). David