From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 4 16:58:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69489773; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6881138; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from delphij-macbook.local (c-67-188-85-47.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.85.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF97F9E76; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1372957118; bh=JlheDK0zuga1FwJVO2ox2612qb8nCGDrNQBRQUmcWZI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=mkafSwG3JO1OLJOfg+p/Kf0ZhNit50B/6Swl6ITt3Lyc2Wmaj2Ygq8D6F8o1ke/Q6 N4WCMtmLVL+dluzPaUG/vtrzctazd9WF4d3RmWruzGr7AE3h8hlzg1qf7ifJl/Vdfa puF9kGq7hkfODIKVTPMcwhRWvG5BkL1CWJ6siCVM= Message-ID: <51D5A9BD.5010705@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 09:58:37 -0700 From: Xin Li Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky Subject: Re: ZFS default compression algo for contemporary FreeBSD versions References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: 513 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, avg@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:58:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 7/4/13 5:22 AM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Collegues, > > is it sane to just set 'zfs compression=on dataset' to achieve best > algo on fresh FreeBSD systems (-current and/or stable/9)? > > The manual page is a bit uncertain about this... No, we do plan to make LZ4 the default though. Both I and Martin have pending patches to make LZ4 the default (also for metadata, see my svn branch) but I get distracted from that recently and have not get a chance to revisit this yet. Cheers, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR1am9AAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzkSkH/AlSQh/DWaBiNvPopEagHtPq /7fa9GKgmuj96PhqspNQz9Shh76KcmzSGg57mbFDwIoh3wo8e/jI8KhDSxK3Hnbg rt9CSR+ys2NGxsmLAeGKTljO3xWlj/3lqPZEHXe+wsIRH0jpIOa/tjeXtZxV95nL s+ROqn0CnC+smYg/FlXDqzs7PtNt/2G5YSJTRTsY1bA1M/4vgGsskAZsL7TyeG9b 7Jhhue7lOYux0lqqiZ2bSdbZ4BM2LjTN88122TJHxxKVGnwykqXi2PEO7ciwCIMG IyTLpj16GAAR4L5cLH5G0Tnb0ztSifNxej5n/pGLZJfw0hJy3FKvYF4p235x+kE= =+Zcm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----