From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 17 17:02:46 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B188106566B
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:02:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de)
Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A528D8FC15
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:02:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [195.4.92.22] (helo=12.mx.freenet.de)
	by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port
	25) (Exim 4.69 #92)
	id 1MoKNX-00010x-Kf; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:43 +0200
Received: from tc0b1.t.pppool.de ([89.55.192.177]:20065
	helo=ernst.jennejohn.org)
	by 12.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port
	25) (Exim 4.69 #94)
	id 1MoKNX-0005XP-E4; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:43 +0200
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:42 +0200
From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de>
To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
Message-ID: <20090917190242.4b79e1ba@ernst.jennejohn.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090917161519.GB1212@albert.catwhisker.org>
References: <20090917134924.GZ1212@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<20090917170431.47be4a06@ernst.jennejohn.org>
	<20090917152957.GA1212@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<b269bc570909170832u792f851fk4ace6bfa4c9a7321@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090917161519.GB1212@albert.catwhisker.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/compat6x port no longer sufficient for DRI under head?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:02:46 -0000

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:15:19 -0700
David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:32:09AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > ...
> > Have you tried re-enabling hald and dbus and configuring X to use those?
> 
> No, I haven't.
> 
> One of the reasons I stopped trying to use hald(8) was that when I
> booted head, hald went into a 100% CPU busy loop.  (Mind, this was with
> hald built inder stable/6.)
> 

The current hald behaves much better.  I saw the problem of 100% CPU
usage a few months (weeks?) ago too, but now hald uses virtually no CPU.

Of course, my hald was made with sources from head, so YMMV.

---
Gary Jennejohn