Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:51:43 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Confusion about process states and invariants Message-ID: <xzp7jtt410g.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040626122843.46724N-100000@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:38:43 -0400 (EDT)") References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040626122843.46724N-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > FYI, two of the reported problems were in sysctl_kern_proc() and > linprocfs. pseudofs, not linprocfs. > One of those has been patched by checking p_ucred for NULL; > the other has not. No. The proposed patch for sysctl_kern_proc() wouldn't have worked, and I would have backed it out if it had been committed. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7jtt410g.fsf>