From owner-freebsd-security Tue Oct 12 4:11:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from megaweapon.zigg.com (megaweapon.zigg.com [206.114.60.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944A614EF0 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 04:11:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@zigg.com) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by megaweapon.zigg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA49539; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 07:11:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matt@zigg.com) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 07:11:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Behrens To: Parag Patel Cc: tom brown , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it just me or is the ssh port broken for Release 3.3? In-Reply-To: <64292.939706444@pinhead.parag.codegen.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Parag Patel wrote: : One could always engage in a bit of civil disobediance and comment out : the line that says "USA_RESIDENT=yes" in /etc/make.conf... Along those lines, are packages like ssh and openssl faster when _not_ linked with rsaref? It seems to me they might be, because they're actively maintained and generally developed with Linux, so they might have some x86 optimizations. I honestly haven't looked into it though :-) Matt Behrens Owner/Administrator, zigg.com Chief Engineer, Nameless IRC Network To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message