From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 02:30:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B571A1065675; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736068FC12; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n1A2TwXJ033205; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:29:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:30:04 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20090209.193004.-148135765.imp@bsdimp.com> To: sam@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <498F0BC2.2050302@freebsd.org> References: <200902081233.n18CX5n5023301@svn.freebsd.org> <498F0BC2.2050302@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, wkoszek@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r188309 - head/sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:26 -0000 In message: <498F0BC2.2050302@freebsd.org> Sam Leffler writes: : Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: : > Author: wkoszek : > Date: Sun Feb 8 12:33:05 2009 : > New Revision: 188309 : > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/188309 : > : > Log: : > Further NOTES cleanup -- following drivers didn't survive TTY-ng : > and aren't included in NOTES anyway: cy(4), rc(4), rp(4). : > : > si(4) doesn't belong to global NOTES. : > : > : I'm not sure I agree w/ yanking drivers entirely because they don't : work. If they are commented out w/ a note why this will help people : find them and possibly resuscitate them. If they are well and truly : gone from then tree then sure--but as of today they are still in svn. I'd leave them commented out for how. We usually give folks about a year to make the jump for some major rework like this, then kill it from the tree. Is there any reason not to follow that this time? Warner