From owner-freebsd-arch Thu May 2 10:44:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E2237B41B for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA06259; Fri, 3 May 2002 03:43:52 +1000 Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 03:45:22 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Julian Elischer Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Subject: Re: deperlifying sockstat(1) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020503034140.C4801-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 1 May 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message , Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > >I'm working on a C version of sockstat(1), and to complete it I need > > >to do nasty stuff like using libkvm and defining _KERNEL before > > >including some headers (see fstat). I'm starting to think that it > > >would be easier to just make a kern.sockstat sysctl node, and make > > >sockstat(1) a #!/bin/sh wrapper around sysctl(8). Ideas? > > > > sysctl is way better than libkvm because it provides a chance > > for presentation. > > unless sockstat gets a -N -M capacity such as teh other similar programs.. Who uses this? No one complained when it was broken for vmstat -m. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message