From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 26 11:38: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127FE37B479 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9QIY9614522; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:34:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:34:09 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Warner Losh , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Message-ID: <20001026193409.A14486@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <21367.972424567@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <21367.972424567@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:56:07PM -0700 Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:56:07PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > [redirected to just -current; I'm not sure what this has to do with -net] > > > I agree. I've been using them for a while on my dog slow Windows CE > > machine. There were some minor issues when they were first committed > > to NetBSD on some platforms (due to a too early use of ps and some > > brokeness in ps on pmax, for example), but these were quickly > > resolved. > > So, who wants to do a proof-of-concept implementation for -current > which integrates with our existing rc.conf mechanism? In order to > obey POLA, we should at least have the separate scripts switch off the > same knobs whenever possible. As far as I'm aware, Neil Blakey-Milner is doing just that (I'm surprised he hasn't said so himself, although I think this week/fortnight's quite hectic for him in the real world). N To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message