From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Wed Apr  5 08:06:39 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587C8D2FAC2
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  5 Apr 2017 08:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz)
Received: from mail.neosystem.cz (mail.neosystem.cz
 [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:5ab8::10:15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26162353;
 Wed,  5 Apr 2017 08:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz)
Received: from mail.neosystem.cz (unknown [127.0.10.15])
 by mail.neosystem.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B376630;
 Wed,  5 Apr 2017 10:06:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.neosystem.cz
Received: from dragon.sn.neosystem.cz (unknown
 [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:5ab8::100:a809])
 by mail.neosystem.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BA0156628;
 Wed,  5 Apr 2017 10:06:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:56:25 +0200
From: Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org>
To: miwi@FreeBSD.org
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 218270] panic: sbsndptr: sockbuf (...) and mbuf (...)
 clashing
Message-Id: <20170405095625.bc2ba3aaae44a1f1aa1504be@neosystem.cz>
In-Reply-To: <bug-218270-34494-paoGTUuIjZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-218270-34494@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-218270-34494-paoGTUuIjZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Organization: neosystem.cz
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; x86_64-portbld-dragonfly4.7)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:06:39 -0000

On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 14:37:54 +0000
bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote:

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218270
> Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> changed:
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|New                         |Closed
>          Resolution|---                         |FIXED

Does it mean that hw.igb.num_queues workaround is not necessary (to keep
the system stable under network load) on 10-STABLE anymore?

Thank you.

--
						Daniel Bilik