From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Jun 16 18:27:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0A114BDA for ; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:27:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from alphard (alphard [128.130.111.37]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA07419; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 03:20:03 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 03:20:03 +0200 (MET DST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: Soren Schmidt , emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [emulation] Bug in linux fcntl syscall? In-Reply-To: <37627BEA.9687CA5@scc.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 12 Jun 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > The patches are attached as a single file. All three patches are for > -current. I also got patches for enhancement (3) for 3.2 and 2.2.8 > releases on my page (http://www.scc.nl/~marcel/) In general, in which direction is Linux emulation headed? We had problems in 2.2.x when Linux emulation was out-of-date and for sites like mine (with constant presure to move to Linux) having rock solid FreeBSD-RELEASE with most advanced Linux emulation (only in -CURRENT?) is strongly desirable? How can I/we solve this dilemma? Or are you planing to backport most of the changes in -CURRENT to -RELEASE as well? Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message