From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 28 02:06:26 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA05546 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 02:06:26 -0800 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA05530 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 02:06:21 -0800 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA03329; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 18:06:48 GMT Date: Tue, 28 Mar 1995 18:06:48 +0000 () From: Brian Tao To: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. In-Reply-To: <1863.796377740@freefall.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 28 Mar 1995, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Well, let's put it this way: We have a fair bit of space on the CDROM > and so I see no problem with including SEVERAL browsers from a "pick a > browser" menu. If the user doesn't like one, they can always go back > and chose another. But including what is clearly beta software on a public release (especially a CD-ROM release!) rubs me the wrong way. There should be at least a warning printed during the installation that Arena may fail in several areas because of its unfinished state. It is still rather rough around the edges and can crash for no apparent reason. I don't want people to associate this with FreeBSD itself. Put up a disclaimer, or a pointer to an FTP site where someone, on their own time, can retrieve Arena. > I still think it's sexy enough to include. Yes, this much I agree with. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org