From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jul 26 10:40:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA09546 for current-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 10:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scf-fs.usc.edu (scf-fs.usc.edu [128.125.253.183]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA09540 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 10:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.125.224.118] (comserv-i-46.usc.edu [128.125.224.118]) by scf-fs.usc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4/usc) with ESMTP id KAA29445 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender: larse@scf.usc.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199707261622.QAA00289@ubiq.veda.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 09:39:02 -0800 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG From: Lars Eggert Subject: Who is working on the TCP stack? Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, and sorry if this not the right place to ask. I will be implementing some changes to TCP as part of a research project during the fall (if you are interested, see RFC 2140, "TCP Control Block Interdependence." J. Touch. April 1997.) I was wondering, if anybody else is working on the TCP stack at this time. Would -current be the right place to implement those changes, or should I stick with -stable? Is there anything else I should be aware of? Thanks, Lars PS: If this is off-topic for the list (sorry), please respond by personal mail. __________________________________________________________________________ Lars Eggert larse@usc.edu Information Sciences Institute http://www-scf.usc.edu/~larse/ University of Southern California Finger or email for PGP public key.