From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 21:32:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E359116A41F for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:32:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B23A43D53 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:32:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12975 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2005 21:32:31 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Dec 2005 21:32:31 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2FCFB2841D; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:32:30 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Ashley Moran References: <43932546.4090904@redstarling.com> <200512051056.33305.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:49:21 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <200512051056.33305.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> Message-ID: <44bqzv2psh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to track 6.0 increments ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:32:36 -0000 Ashley Moran writes: > On Sunday 04 December 2005 17:20, ke.han wrote: > > I don't want to follow current or stable (I don't think). =A0I just want > > security fixes and other changes that might be termed 6.01 if there were > > such a thing. >=20 > I've always wondered this. Is there a reason why the FreeBSD team put=20 > security updates into a branch rather than a 6_0_x release tag? It's more convenient for the RE folks, usually more convenient for end-users, and uses fewer resources in propagating the repository changes. --=20 Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/