From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  2 17:44:07 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8091D16A420
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Mar 2006 17:44:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com)
Received: from gate.bitblocks.com (bitblocks.com [209.204.185.216])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2929C43D5E
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Mar 2006 17:44:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com)
Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gate.bitblocks.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k22HhmWV057573;
	Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:43:49 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com)
Message-Id: <200603021743.k22HhmWV057573@gate.bitblocks.com>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:06:08 MST."
	<20060302.100608.80501136.imp@bsdimp.com> 
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:43:48 -0800
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@BitBlocks.com>
Cc: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: style(9) question 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:44:07 -0000

Warner Losh writes:
> Heck, we'd be better off contemplating the lint in our belly buttons.

As you wish!

$ lint belly button
lint: unknown file type: belly

lint: unknown file type: button

lint: cannot find llib-lc.ln
Lint pass2:
usage: lint2 -hpstxuHF -Clib -l lib ... src1 ...

> Why do it in the first place?  It makes it look consisntant with if
> (foo) or while (foo).  return foo; looks inconsistant: keyword (expr);

$ cat>x.c<<EOF
f()
{
	goto (foo);
	foo: return 1;
}
EOF
$ cc -c x.c
x.c: In function `f':
x.c:3: error: syntax error before '(' token

We now return (you) to the usual programme after this silliness.