From owner-freebsd-chat Sun May 16 9:43:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smtp13.bellglobal.com (smtp13.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB76714CBB for ; Sun, 16 May 1999 09:43:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu) Received: from localhost.nowhere (ppp18393.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.130.73]) by smtp13.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA24799; Sun, 16 May 1999 12:44:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.nowhere (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA43349; Sun, 16 May 1999 12:44:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 12:44:42 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Dean Lombardo Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nt source licenses... Message-ID: <19990516124441.A43261@mAd> References: <373EBEC5.D8B1E0E0@excite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <373EBEC5.D8B1E0E0@excite.com>; from Dean Lombardo on Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:49:09PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [-current -=> -chat] [Re: stealing an NTFS implementation after getting an NT source license] On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:49:09PM +0100, Dean Lombardo wrote: > > OK - perhaps I should rephrase it - they *can* sue, but they are not > very likely to do so without good reason. Do you really think that Besides that, even if they did sue, while it would certainly have some negative effects, we'd get a lot of useful publicity. -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message