From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 17:54:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F7FCFA586 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 17:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22c.google.com (mail-it0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF681BF5 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 17:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 203so37622895ith.0 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:54:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=LhQmhPHmBrstxAcMvAq7WZTk4rCY4YiiLsIW3uUVPbo=; b=d7xOzPonvtorSbIC4iY8Uy3BKXmeigqzzlFqE698Ck/nY25vwUbjFg3WFLKqpIt58F i7d3qsntGRgqi/f9GVB8bdWtK0mwan2WNZs8PdLV65VjvBW2Lbo8fF3Xv5GsekGLE44M 2lt8PVKIq6lw/klASAIl/YyRFJD78QjfR/A1v1OJZZQ+I96R5xdagUayu6pXZrpgd+Oa tNrH+tMtTekokkAAoB1leyqAdv5r++jxJIJizXdS/90pY/uu3P3Pm3XuxbZvob0fEqoM THpmitPtDgjJW8Aw37WMGubeACo5zSqZqMSeDItJ03IjLKcumPYKJRijXvNOVPf9Au4L iBQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LhQmhPHmBrstxAcMvAq7WZTk4rCY4YiiLsIW3uUVPbo=; b=kvatKUIvw3SHQwjWGHKywh7d+sjPLL98o+tBVxO0UdpokE3noFsp+uydcUUVLOmP+q CQafN92OCLdv2wpZb6GvU0GupfOqVx8hHAWhgJ5DXQcbUZeBSrKclg6i1/pJnxs5NhX5 MhZRuZAujdSAr5sBlUtKw0FQ15cIQOK2Uy3Vuw1VnXmLycbufqBJmxShuRJbVOhY2f7n invvFsKC31iKozNzxK+YNJipC8T/052d7z1YZSBKXjWoJo930axm2MoJTqH3huP6/Ejo TvQnAIlQdvmopn9PHUJkS7kME4ZehAb8Ku8YgB4r+Oz8Pby8k8r27M7ZCRapxguOU5Py AGWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nhZHFzWuqyb/kkWp0XdP6RIPLjusbPwFbqk6LzybeXNyEiu4wwgsJyNptTPSP3hw4XRmr37ZIXrrhbQA== X-Received: by 10.36.93.213 with SMTP id w204mr13173387ita.60.1488736443640; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:54:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by 10.79.134.129 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:54:03 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.53.245.200] In-Reply-To: <20170305041743.98af9e94662f8524a640b5d0@bidouilliste.com> References: <1488682131.69705.55.camel@freebsd.org> <20170305041743.98af9e94662f8524a640b5d0@bidouilliste.com> From: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 10:54:03 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Dj-e7XqhQWFN1sdYQf6klOxnVzY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cubox-i Hummingboard images gone To: Emmanuel Vadot Cc: Ian Lepore , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 17:54:04 -0000 On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Sat, 04 Mar 2017 19:48:51 -0700 > Ian Lepore wrote: > >> On Sat, 2017-03-04 at 21:32 -0500, Tom Pusateri wrote: >> > On the FreeBSD download page, https://www.freebsd.org/where.html, >> > there is a 11.0-RELEASE image for Solid Run Cubox-i Hummingboard >> > systems. But there are no longer any images for 11.0 Stable or 12.0 >> > Current. It seems as though new images are not being built. Is there >> > a hardware problem or lack of interest? I have several of these >> > boards and loved having the images built. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tom >> > >> >> I would guess it's because the corresponding u-boot packages are no >> longer available. I have no idea why that is (I used to maintain the >> u-boot stuff, but others are doing it now), but the list of images >> roughly corresponds to the list of available u-boot pkgs. >> >> -- Ian > > u-boot-cubox-hummingbird depends on gcc492 (which vendor u-boot needs) > so it conflict with gcc6XX which the other ones use. > Switching to upstream u-boot is needed but I don't have hardware to > test. I have a iMX6 board, maybe two, that I bought for this. I think mine is the wandboard. But we can trivially switch to the new gcc. Even w/o switching to my new framework, it's just one file away from working (basically, snag gcc5.h or gcc6.h from newer u-boot and use them, or even just use the gcc4.h one). I fought this on other ports before I switched over to the new framework. But of course we should switch if we can... When I looked at the issue last, it appeared that all our iMX6-supported boards that had waco out-of-mailine u-boots had support for them added to upstream. Warner