Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:14:50 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>, www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: query-pr-summary.cgi rework Message-ID: <20050902151450.GB22022@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20050902145937.GA22022@soaustin.net> References: <1029392505.20050901194124@rulez.sk> <20050901230733.GE58269@submonkey.net> <488426177.20050902093840@rulez.sk> <20050902145937.GA22022@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:59:37AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > i386 is around 15M and probably would have given you complete coverage > of all the interesting test cases. Dumb to follow up to oneself, but hey, it's early in the morning yet :-) It turns out that conf gives you as much coverage as i386 (I had not expected to see an 'a' in there). 'r' cases get resolved fairly quickly and there are none currently. btw I like what is here, I think it is much better than what we have. OTOH at least on this laptop, the 'f' color is a little too light -- it is harder to see than the others. IMHO 'f' should stand out the most or at least more than the 's' ones -- they are more likely to be able to be resolved. I could live with either swapping the colors or just making the 'f' color darker. Also, on this laptop, the 'a' and 'p' colors are fairly hard to distinguish, but I don't see that as quite the problem that the above is. Yes, I realize that I am dangerously close to painting the bikeshed. OTOH I spent a fair amount of time looking at those pages :-) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050902151450.GB22022>