Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:48:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201346580.24255@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120620073454.0a5f2f87@scorpio> References: <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> <4FE1AD27.8000704@gmail.com> <CAH3a3KWHYC%2BpbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com> <20120620073454.0a5f2f87@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> A somewhat haphazardly search of the postings in this forum would seem > to indicate that any post questioning the ethics or usefulness of > FreeBSD as compared to other operating systems that elicit six or more strange but usefulness of FreeBSD wasn't questioned. > > By the way Fred, please don't "Top Post". That pisses people off too, Well. I have to explain people at least once a day not to do it. Sometimes i even get a result and sometime someone learn. rarely.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201346580.24255>