From nobody Mon Aug 28 08:53:00 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RZ48Z3Xfwz4rK1g for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RZ48W46kYz3M2J for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp has no SPF policy when checking 153.125.133.21) smtp.mailfrom=junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp; dmarc=none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-1-88-210.area1b.commufa.jp [123.1.88.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 37S8r0n4079361 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:53:00 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:53:00 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: etcupdate -p, and other uses of etcupdate(8) (was: Has the update procedure changed?) Message-Id: <20230828175300.4ef0bcaddbc36ea7a52c33df@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <98bcf483-626c-7963-b008-02cb00703133@gmail.com> References: <7A0E604D-EF40-4F10-B597-F1F076507192@gmail.com> <98bcf483-626c-7963-b008-02cb00703133@gmail.com> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.902]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sakura.ne.jp]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org] X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RZ48W46kYz3M2J On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 18:16:35 +0100 Graham Perrin wrote: > On 07/08/2023 16:51, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > UPDATING seems to match the Makefile except that Makefile is far less > > detailed. The Makefile even says "See src/UPDATING `COMMON ITEMS' for > > more complete information." > > > > …  "etcupdate -p". … > > prompted me to > look at > . > > > Is this fortune-provided tip outdated? For new install with bsdinstall [1] and binary update by freebsd-update [2], yes. But for src updates, no [3]. [1] https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004194.html [2] https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004208.html [3] https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004210.html -- Tomoaki AOKI