Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:00:44 +1100 From: Alex <joovke@joovke.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XenServer? Message-ID: <4D6083DC.4070008@joovke.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5tUG2EWB0CrD2cWqbH_8XVyjJeh2huijuj01k@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTiktYkyrJ9Kzo7E9EAMBC9n9JzAD5-spYAzUnQnX@mail.gmail.com> <4D5E7CF7.8020209@barafranca.com> <AANLkTin5tUG2EWB0CrD2cWqbH_8XVyjJeh2huijuj01k@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I mentioned it and found TSO to be the cause. if someone else has seen this issue too, would you mind getting them to comment on PR 154428? Thanks! On 02/19/11 02:10, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 18 February 2011 15:06, Hugo Silva<hugo@barafranca.com> wrote: > >> Performance seems to be acceptable. There's a gotcha with PF, which someone >> else mentioned in this list recently. One has to disable tcp.tso to get >> decent throughput. >> >> Disabling it enabled a colleague who is currently in Africa to go from >> stalled..2KB/s sftp connections to 70KB/s. > I hope that 70 kB/s is due to him being in Africa and not Xen+FreeBSD > performance :) I'm thinking of using this on a moderately loaded web > server (cca 5 GB/day traffic). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D6083DC.4070008>