From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Aug 20 16:35:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8681074D5A for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [212.12.50.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40E276367 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id C596D1F0196; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: Bind to port <1024 in jail From: Stefan Bethke In-Reply-To: <30A6405A-6DC1-461E-B45D-CFFF659F80F8@lists.zabbadoz.net> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 18:35:55 +0200 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <75536186-7D58-498C-BFC6-9284EB7CB444@lassitu.de> <2FA29D2E-7C15-4C9D-A59B-98E9EA916891@lassitu.de> <30A6405A-6DC1-461E-B45D-CFFF659F80F8@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:35:59 -0000 > Am 20.08.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb = : >=20 > On 20 Aug 2018, at 16:22, Stefan Bethke wrote: >=20 >>>> Is there a way to allow regular processes to bind to low ports? >>>=20 >>> you have to set it on the base system; alternatively with vnet you = might be able to change it per-jail. >>=20 >> Do you feel it=E2=80=99s OK to enable VIMAGE in -stable? When I tried = last in 2016, I had stability issues, I think related to pf. >=20 > =E2=80=9CIf you know what you are doing it won=E2=80=99t panic=E2=80=9D = ;-) I think with 12 I=E2=80=99d be a lot more confident about = stability. Most fixes could not and were not MFCed. OK then, should I move to -current and try there? I=E2=80=99ve not = tracked -current on a production box in years (I think the last time was = around 3 or 4), but I=E2=80=99m willing to give it a go, seeing that the = code freeze is about to start. Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811