From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 00:54:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74F31065677 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (75-101-96-57.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.96.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9AA88FC14 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4435 invoked by uid 1001); 1 Feb 2012 00:28:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:28:28 -0800 From: David Thiel To: Emanuel Haupt Message-ID: <20120201002804.GD82239@redundancy.redundancy.org> References: <201201312131.q0VLVPI3000765@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F285E83.7000405@FreeBSD.org> <20120201003411.44bb3e9f.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <20120201010845.e0ae283a.ehaupt@critical.ch> <20120201012105.8562e5a9.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120201012105.8562e5a9.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13 X-OpenPGP-Key-available: http://redundancy.redundancy.org/lx.gpg X-Face: %H~{$1~NOw1y#%mM6{|4:/, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio Makefile ports/audio/wmmixer Makefile distinfo pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:54:47 -0000 On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:20:41AM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > Installed a package from wmsmixer. From the looks of it it's a > > different application: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/snippets/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer.png > > but on a closer look, looking at the help output the pretty much look > from the same origin: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/snippets/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer2.png > > which one should we keep? IIRC wmsmixer is a fork of wmmixer and contains a few minor enhancements. I think it should be kept. I'll go ahead and remove the current master site, as it appears to have been domainsquatted.