Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:28:28 -0800 From: David Thiel <lx@redundancy.redundancy.org> To: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@critical.ch>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio Makefile ports/audio/wmmixer Makefile distinfo pkg-descr Message-ID: <20120201002804.GD82239@redundancy.redundancy.org> In-Reply-To: <20120201012105.8562e5a9.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> References: <201201312131.q0VLVPI3000765@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F285E83.7000405@FreeBSD.org> <20120201003411.44bb3e9f.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <20120201010845.e0ae283a.ehaupt@critical.ch> <20120201012105.8562e5a9.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:20:41AM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > Installed a package from wmsmixer. From the looks of it it's a > > different application: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/snippets/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer.png > > but on a closer look, looking at the help output the pretty much look > from the same origin: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/snippets/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer2.png > > which one should we keep? IIRC wmsmixer is a fork of wmmixer and contains a few minor enhancements. I think it should be kept. I'll go ahead and remove the current master site, as it appears to have been domainsquatted.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120201002804.GD82239>