From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 18 20:21:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB45D16A4CF
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:21:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from f04n07.cac.psu.edu (f04s07.cac.psu.edu [128.118.141.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA2C43D45
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:21:42 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from tmm324@psu.edu)
Received: from [66.71.101.5] (TMM324.rh.psu.edu [66.71.101.5])
	by f04n07.cac.psu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9IKLeEx045192
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:21:40 -0400
Message-ID: <417425D7.9010909@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:21:43 -0400
From: Thomas Moyer <tmm324@psu.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Subject: Two Questions ( atapicam related and scheduler related)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:21:45 -0000

I been following the progress of the 5.3 release and I thought they were 
changing the shceduler from SCHED_4BSD to SCHED_ULE?  Also I recently 
acquired a DVD+-RW and was wondering if I should stick with using burncd 
and growisfs with the standard /dev/acd0 or should I switch to using 
atapicam?  Is there any sort of a performance gain?  What are the 
advantages and disadvantages of both?