From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 4 04:18:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EDF16A420 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:18:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mroyce@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EEA43D6D for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:18:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mroyce@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so809272wra for ; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 20:18:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RrkEB2KELgxlVj48KOP/Dt7lSBpIwPbLJU4x++CAQ7ju2ViravYyHc61Zy8wix55AeNJFSR1gTAzGPU5+UKmQ4XQTgfXXvlWPxSphv4Fv42cPrhjdGyOvnchyG266d8XzkPx0RwAbwNEhEOZN8CE40bSyw5K75TJzohNXwupM+k= Received: by 10.64.193.4 with SMTP id q4mr2192979qbf; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 20:18:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.163.7 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:18:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b0d6fa20512032018g581dc6feybcf13c05e85af3ec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:18:02 -0800 From: Royce To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20051204004358.GD3698@garage.freebsd.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6.2.5.6.2.20051203155803.05950eb0@baac.net> <20051204004358.GD3698@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror forget question - why forget gm0 instead of ad4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 04:18:07 -0000 Pawel, thanks! This is just the info I needed. Now it makes sense, rather than risking running commands I don't understand. Royce On 12/3/05, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > If a drive fails or is not detected, gmirror doesn't know if it was ad4, > da0, da0s1a or anything else, because it discovers components based on > their metadata, not names. By doing 'gmirror forget' you say: "forget > about missing components". Without forgetting missing components you > can't run specific actions, which need to be notes in metadata of all > components. > >